Human expert interviews
Request qualified specialist input through a governed private-beta workflow, with expert judgment kept distinct from market evidence.
How the research interaction works
Interviewer or facilitator
A human moderator chosen by the research team or agreed service partner
Respondent or source
A qualified human specialist whose identity, fit, and conflicts are reviewed
The conversation takes place outside Gotopico. The product can support discovery, consultation intent, proposed times, survey invitations, and evidence preparation.
What works now
- Browse and filter the expert directory
- Review limited expert profiles and visible trust signals
- Submit a consultation request and proposed time in private beta
- Invite an authenticated expert to a structured survey
What this option does not include
- A connected native calling provider
- In-product recording or transcription
- Guaranteed expert acceptance or meeting time
- Automatic interview synthesis presented as fact
Good fit
- • Specialized technical, market, or operating context
- • Pressure-testing assumptions before a high-stakes decision
- • Reviewing a survey, model, or decision memo
Bad fit
- • Estimating population prevalence from one specialist
- • Seeking material non-public or prohibited information
- • Replacing legal, clinical, financial, or compliance review
How your team stays in control
Your team retains responsibility for research quality, privacy, and the final decision.
- Identity and role verification
- Conflict-of-interest and prohibited-topic screening
- Consent, confidentiality, recording, retention, and attribution choices
- Source labels and human approval on every synthesized assertion
How the workflow works
Step 1
Define the decision
State which decision the specialist input should inform and which claims remain out of scope.
Step 2
Qualify the people
Review relevant experience, identity, conflicts, availability, confidentiality, and consent before outreach.
Step 3
Approve the instrument
A human approves the screener, guide or survey, prohibited topics, attribution, and handling rules.
Step 4
Review the evidence
Separate sourced observations, expert judgment, uncertainty, and the decision owner's final interpretation.
What your team receives
Related research paths
Explore private-beta profiles
Tell us what decision you need to support, and we will help you choose the most appropriate available research path.